WebApr 24, 2024 · State of Maharashtra, AIR 1973 SC 157; Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection, Income-Tax, New Delhi & Ors., AIR 1974 SC 348; and State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot … WebISSUE: Are Sections 132(1) and 132(5) of Rule 112(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(f) and (g) and 31 of the Constitution of India?
Untitled PDF Riesgo Emergencia - Scribd
WebPooran Mal v. Director of Inspection [1974] 1 S.C.C. 345, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of sec. 132 and the search and seizure were also held to be legal. … WebPooran Mal v. The Director of Inspection (Investigation), New Delhi & Ors [1974 (1) SCC 345] held that “unless there is an express or necessary implied prohibition in the Constitution or other law, evidence obtained as a result of illegal search or … how many calories in 100g oats
Pooran Mal Vs The Director of Inspection …
WebSep 19, 2003 · Union of India1, a case under NDPS Act where decision of the constitution bench in Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation), New Delhi & Ors.2 was noticed for the proposition that courts in India and England have consistently refused to exclude relevant evidence merely on the ground that it is obtained by illegal search or seizure. WebPooran Mal v. Director of Inspection of Income Tax2elucidates this position perfectly. The Supreme Court declined to issue a writ of prohibition in restraint of the use of evidence … Web• These provisions are constitutionally valid – Pooran Mal Vs. Director of Inspection -93 ITR 505 (SC)] • The in-built safe guards ensure that the privacy of the citizen is not impinged upon and its consequences may be serious to a sensitive man the in-built safeguards have to be satisfied before any order for any search and seizure high rated natural gas wall heaters